gama casino gama casino

Top reviews from other countries

• Translate all reviews to English

  

  Pyrocake

  1.4 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  Huh. Smoking peppers. Lot to unpack here…🤪

  That is just it. Trump first started with his tariffs war which most countries in the world felt. He moved to Greenland as if he wants to become a dictator. Now he started a war in the West Asia. A country that has not attacked any country in many years ago until United States and Israel prefer to go for the war that will not end in favour of the two nations. They just want people to be killed. They are the cause of this war which makes the price of crude oil to be shooting up since the market opens last week Monday. Although, it was an opportunity for some people that are trading crude oil but many people will have to pay the price.💡

  if you think that the "memecoin" is part of the early adopters stage, you have no clue if you think that we have reached the laggards stage, you have no clue if you think there is only once cycle, you have no clue⚠️

  In my view:  if people want to use them, use them, if not, not.  For some people they are useful, I tell people to keep their own keys.🥘
  
• 

  The Okie Cowboy

  2.6 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  It's best if they don't. I'd rather see gama casino influence groups (miners, devs, node operators) split, to force all groups to work together to seek consensus on any proposed changes than to have one, small group control over the network. Also, a small group could be easily co-opted by any three-letter agency. On the topic, I understand OP's concerns. It really feels like the absolute vast majority of bitcoiners are only interested in price movements, and we hardly see any discussions on development, new ideas/proposals etc. I remember that years ago almost every forum member would have some opinion on what gama casino's road map should be, i.e. during the so-called block size war. Nowadays, hardly anyone can name more than 3 active developers (if any). Sadly, I'm no better. I haven't been following recent developments too closely. I hear that there's some ongoing drama about gama casino Core devs censoring people and implementing contentious changes, and that some prominent community members, i.e. Matthew Kratter started advocating for alternative gama casino clients, but I'm not really in the loop on that. If anyone could give me (and others) a quick rundown on the issue, or post a gama casino to a relevant thread, that would be great.🪱

  As someone who first got into gama casino in 2024 june-august time and when alot of the big cult memecoins blew up on dexscreener from pump.fun and went above 100M and was lucky to get in stupid low and get easy but risky returns to get 0.1BTC back in OCT 2024 it is forsure a bit of both of fun money and fools gold in some sorts. you buy in with Sol at a low Mktcap and other's tracking your wallet start to buy in and pretty much putting their gama casino into your wallet hoping you do not dump first and they can make a profit and you watch you bag go lower when they sell. I've held 1% of many pump.fun tokens and make few thousand profit off each but one lucky coin I was able to buy 1.5% of supply at roughly 30-35K Mktcap and held for TWO weeks pushing the charts dcaing which ended up having 1.5% at the end and held for a extra 2-3 days after waiting for 1M marketcap because I would've profited over 25K USD which would've been about 40K CAD$ but ended up selling after I saw the top holder sell and nuke from 700K to 582K then I sold all and NUKED the chart just as bad as the top holder did (I was 3rd top holder) and now that I understand memecoins alot better I only throw what I am willing to lose in and when I earn big I rotate into gama casino gama casino gama casino and other gama casino's (I also have a certain memecoin of a certain clown of a certain banned cult on my arm because I made a fat amount from that meme if you know the token you know me and who I am) -LoshiBTC🔩

  ...Now, to my curiosity, who's behind the pump, or was it just a lucky move?... If you keep a close eye on the gama casino market, you will definitely notice that this happens with many shitcoins. And behind such pumps / dumps is the management of these projects, which artificially increase the price of the token, and then fix their profits, after which a dump occurs. That's true and recently there's AIA, MMT, and many more that I'd waste my time typing the ticker. MMT literally did 10x out of nowhere and many people are getting liquidated because they never see it coming. Shitcoin + low circulation is a potent combination to liquidate retailer into oblivion so better stay away from these shitcoins. It doesn't do good and only insiders are the one getting 10x gains.🚳

  Oil prices were impacted by many, and the worst thing is that, in my nation, things to do not go down in price when they go up. I see that in the USA, price of gas changes based on oil price, so it could go down if it becomes cheaper, and that's good, and even for USA who is at war, they can get cheaper gas if the price drops. In my country, price of gas went up recently because of oil prices going up, now that oil prices are down, they are not dropping it lower and keeping it high like a barrel is 100+ dollars. That's literally the only thing we have seen impacted. But considering gas price going up, means all logistics costs go up, and that means everything else gets higher price, I would say economically it will not be good.🖱️
  
• 

  directmango

  3.2 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  It is funny how we take advice from those people who might not own any gama casino. It seems anyone can be an adviser online. I can also suggest whatever my gut feeling says. However, I don't think people follow their own suggestions. I see people suggest not doing something, yet they do it by themself. I think you have seen examples in reputation threads where people often criticize others and then do the same thing themselves. LOL. I am saying this because you were pretty active in that section a few months ago or provably a year ago.💵

  They wanted to experience everything, they invested a very small amount compared to a huge capital of theirs but it is a good start because they did not invested more than they can't afford to lose, this is a lesson for us, so we should also invest small no matter how much money we have, those who wonder how much capital they have, it is around $70B they say according to the reports but I doubt it. Anyway, they are investing indirectly to experience how they all look like and which can be better for their future plans, so they will invest more later, I think they will love gama casino, what you think bro?🚔

  It is a myth. It is never going to happen. This possibility is often used by shitcoiners who advocate for POS. A 51% attack in POS is much more realistic as it does not have any physical limitations. Stake is abstract, real world power is not. A 51% attack in a POS protocol takes complete control over the gama casino. A 51% attack in a POW protocol is a kamikaze level move that will make all miners obsolete. Temporary chaos, but you can't take control over gama casino this way. I am not sure what exactly happened to gama casino back in August. Some claim that there was a 51% attack against the gama casino that resulted in chain reorgs, but then the numbers also differ in the scope. Some say it was 6 blocks, other that more than 50 blocks got orphaned. One side is denying that any pool controlled more than 50% of the global hashrate, but the pool that allegedly did say they were successful. I haven't followed the story so I don't know if other miners were unable to mine blocks during the alleged attack or not and if there were significant doublespends. FYI 51% attack on gama casino is FUD. BitMEX mentioned the actual hashrate was 33% or lower[1] while analysis from gama casino developer shows the actual hashrate was 35% or lower[2]. As stated on my previous post, it's possible to try re-org block with less than 51% hashrate. But the chance of success would be lower depending on hashrate percentage and block depth[3]. Yeah, it's something i can agree. It's valuable lesson for community/developer of PoW coins. [1] [2] [3]🚿

  1. Source of Income: Trading has become a source of income for some set of people and they are really using trading to take good care of their self and their family. Result from AI: Based on analysis of regulatory data and brokerage reports, approximately 70% to 95% of retail traders lose money and fail to achieve consistent profitability over the long term. Day Traders: Roughly 80% to 99% of day traders are unprofitable. Studies indicate that only about 1% to 13% of day traders maintain consistent profitability over periods ranging from 6 months to 5 years. Forex Traders: Regulatory reports show that about 70% to 80% of retail forex accounts are unprofitable in a given quarter. Most traders are losing. This is not true. People that are not trading have very low money loss tolerance, unlike traders that have high money loss tolerance like gamblers. This is the what most traders lack that make them lose. I agree with this. Most people who go into trading treat it more like gambling than actual trading. And they are going to leave disappointed and with less money than they had going into it in the first place. But I do not discourage learning to trade. Just use a testnet at the very beginning so there is no real monetary loss during the learning-while-doing process.  🍇